Peer review for academic conferences.

Take in papers, match them to the right reviewers, and decide with confidence, all in one place built for conferences across Africa and beyond.

Already have an account? Sign in

Blind review
Double-blind by default: authors and reviewers never learn who the other is.
Matched by discipline
Papers go to reviewers who know the field, with conflicts of interest kept out.
Everything in one place
Progress, reminders, reports and an Excel export for every conference.

How it works

Authors submit
Title, abstract, discipline and the full paper, without the authors’ names.
Reviewers are matched
By discipline, never from the author’s institution, with workloads kept even.
They review it
A score from 1 to 5, a recommendation, comments and a marked-up copy.
Organisers decide
Scores side by side. If reviewers disagree, another is added first.
Authors hear back
The decision and every review, by email, with reviewers kept anonymous.

Every author hears back with the decision, each reviewer’s score and comments, and their own paper marked up, whether it was accepted or not.

Reviewers stay anonymous, so they can say what they think.

Conference organisers
Open a call for papers, follow every review, and decide with the scores in front of you.
Talk to us
Authors
Submit to open calls, edit until review starts, and read every review afterwards.
Submit a paper
Reviewers
Review papers in your discipline, on your phone or laptop, anonymously.
Become a reviewer

Reviewers choose the fields they know, and papers are matched to them by discipline, from public health to tourism and events.

Tell us your dates and topics, and we will set up your call for papers.